123 years since the sinking of the USS Maine: What did the loss of one single ship suppose?

Download PDF version

In Cuba they craved for independence while in Spain they said “¡EL DESASTRE!” It was more of a disaster than they thought in the Caribbean as the Spanish-American War opened the path to a new stage of colonialism: the protectorate era, a.k.a. American Imperialism. In February 1898 the USS Maine, an American ship, blew up while it anchored in Havana. This was initially believed to be a Spanish attack. The reason for the explosion was never made clear. Maldwyn A. Jones attributes the disproportionate effects of the sinking to the decade’s heightened nationalism that reigned in the United States. An ideology determined by the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine motivated the patriotic escalation and “[t]he American people embarked upon it to free a colonial people from Old World oppression” (1995, 400). The USS Maine became a symbol of this ideology despite the somehow aleatory nature of the event and the war was fueled by cries exclaiming, “Remember the Maine!” (ibid).

Interestingly, as in Hawaii was the case in Cuba, American protectionism was what ignited the discontent. The implementation of the Wilson–Gorman tariff by the Americans deprived the Cubans of their market for selling sugar and the colony was thrust into misery. Guerrilla uprisings followed and so did the subsequent harsh repression of the Spaniards through a concentration camp policy (Jones 1995, 400). John Quincy Adams, who was the Secretary of State in the Monroe administration, admitted earlier that Cuba was essential to American national interests (qtd. in Cervera Fantoni 309). It is not clear if he referred to economic or ideological interests. Regardless, the island did not reach the much advocated (by the Americans) independence. After the war was won, the military occupation that was imposed in Cuba through the Teller Amendment to aid the country in its way to independence did not finish. Originally, its purpose was “only to restore order and government to that island” (Willard Crompton 2009, 57). It was the implementation of the Platt Amendment which set the precondition to the American withdrawal, establishing provisos like not allowing Cuba to make treatises with powers other than the United States (Jones 1995, 404).

Contrary to Jones, Louis A. Jr. Perez contends that rather than being a by-product, economic interests were always perceivable in the decades preceding the protectorate era. In his words, “the U.S. imperial enterprise proceeded more like spams of purposefulness” (1986, xv). After the Cuban venture, Puerto Rico was ceded to the United States by Spain. The former never accepted its becoming either independent or a new state in its own right. In 1915 the United States imposed a military occupation in Haiti followed a year later by the Dominican Republic. The interventions were justified on the grounds that the countries disorder would bring European presence to the hemisphere; which the Corollary ideology was determined to prevent (Blassingame 1969, 27). However, a closer look into the history of the Caribbean reveals that American intervention often had hegemonic motives: “as a means and an end of hegemony, the defense of capital interests served as the cornerstone of U.S. policy” (Perez 1986, xvi). Further, when these territories have aimed to escape the influence of their powerful neighbour (such was the case with the Haitian revolution or later the communist regime in Cuba) they were marginalised in the workings of the economic system leading to impoverishment. Haiti was, “the greatest producer of wealth in the Caribbean in the eighteenth century, became and remains one of the Caribbean’s and the world’s poorest states” (Wallerstein 2002, 15). As such, what should we be discussing with regards to the Maine? Solely the real reason for her sinking? Rather, this paper recognises that the Caribbean has almost always been – and still is – under colonial regimes whose trepid transformations we should aim to identify. And as has been shown, one of these transformations started with the USS Maine.

Cervera Fantoni, Ángel Luis. 2018. “La Guerra de Estados Unidos contra España: 120 Años de Información Controvertida acerca del Hundimiento del Acoradazo USS Maine en 1898.” In Cádiz: Del Floreciente S.XVIII al Port of the Future del S.XXI, edited by Luis López Molina, Teresa Pontón Aricha, and María Vázquez Fariñas, 309-325. Madrid: Dykinson.
Crompton, Willard. 2009. The Sinking of the USS Maine: Declaring War against Spain. New York: Infobase Publishing.
Jones, Maldwyn A. 1995. The Limits of Liberty: American History. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Perez, Louis A., Jr. 1991. Cuba Under the Platt Amendment, 1902-1934. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. “The Caribbean and the World-System.” Caribbean Dialogue, 8 (3): 15-30.

SUGGESTED CITATION: Fernández Jiménez, Mónica. 2021. “123 years since the sinking of the USS Maine: What did the loss of one single ship suppose?” PopMeC Research Blog. Published February 15.

Cite this blog post
Mónica Fernández Jiménez (2021, February 15). 123 years since the sinking of the USS Maine: What did the loss of one single ship suppose? PopMeC research blog. Retrieved June 25, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.58079/szew

Mónica Fernández Jiménez

I am a PhD student at Universidad de Valladolid where I work on my doctoral thesis on the Caribbean-American diaspora literature. I am also interested in American popular culture, poetry postcolonial studies, Marxism, and feminism. I have studied at the University of Leeds in England, Leiden Universiteit in the Netherlands and Universidad Complutense de Madrid. I currently teach American history and 20th century literature to undergraduate students at Universidad de Valladolid

You may also like...

Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search